Category: Uncategorized

Introduction

The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) sets the legal framework for credit reporting in the United States. Within this framework, a complex scenario can arise when a credit denial occurs before the completion of a dispute investigation by the credit reporting agencies (CRAs) and the furnisher. This article explores the legal considerations, potential claims, and challenges in pursuing remedies under such circumstances.

I. Potential Claims Under the FCRA

A. Sections 1681e(b) – CRA violations before a Credit Dispute is Filed.

These provisions might serve as bases for claims when a credit denial occurs due to inaccuracies in credit reporting:

• Section 1681e(b) requires CRAs to follow reasonable procedures for accuracy.

Potential damages may include actual damages, punitive damages, statutory damages, and attorney’s fees.

B. Sections 1681i(a) and 1681s-2(b) – CRA and Furnisher violations after a Credit Dispute Investigation is Completed and Errors are Not Corrected.

These sections relate to the responsibilities of CRAs and furnishers to conduct reasonable investigations after a dispute is raised:

• Section 1681i(a) governs CRAs’ obligations to investigate disputes.
• Section 1681s-2(b) outlines furnishers’ duties to investigate and correct information after notice from a CRA.

Claims under these sections can be complex when credit denial occurs before the dispute.

II. Injury to Creditworthiness and Mental Anguish

Claims for injury to creditworthiness and mental anguish require proof of causation, a direct link to the dispute investigation, and tangible evidence of distress:

• Causation: Establishing that the injury resulted from inaccurate information that should have been corrected.
• Direct Connection: Proving that failures of the CRA and/or furnisher directly caused or continued the distress and injury.

III. Considerations and Challenges

1. Timing: The credit denial occurring before the dispute investigation might create hurdles in establishing causation and linking damages to specific FCRA violations.
2. State Law: Jurisdiction-specific laws might provide additional avenues for recovery.
3. Fact-Specific Analysis: A detailed review of the facts, relevant case law, and expert consultation may be necessary to build a strong case.

Conclusion

Navigating FCRA claims in the context of credit denials and subsequent dispute investigations requires a nuanced understanding of the Act’s provisions, the timing of events, and the actions of CRAs and furnishers. Legal practitioners must carefully analyze the facts, establish clear causal links, and consider all available legal avenues to effectively advocate for their clients.

While this article offers an overview of potential claims and considerations, each case’s specific circumstances may require tailored legal strategies. Collaboration with fellow attorneys and experts in FCRA litigation, as well as a comprehensive understanding of the relevant jurisdiction’s laws, will be essential in successfully navigating these complex legal waters.

This article is intended for informational purposes and should not be construed as legal advice. Specific legal questions should be addressed with a legal professional with expertise in the relevant area of law.

FREE Case Evaluation
We Accept Clients Nationwide

(888) 498-9533

Section 1681i(a) – Credit Reporting Agencies (CRAs)

Section 1681i(a) of the FCRA addresses the responsibilities of CRAs to conduct a reasonable investigation when a consumer disputes information on their credit report.

If the credit denial occurred before the investigation was completed and was directly related to inaccurate information on the credit report, a claim under 1681i(a) might be challenging. The section primarily deals with the obligations of CRAs to investigate and correct inaccuracies after they have been disputed, not necessarily with their liability for harm occurring before a dispute is raised. However, you may still be able to pursue injury

Section 1681s-2(b) – Furnishers of Information

Section 1681s-2(b) outlines the duties of furnishers to investigate and correct information after receiving notice of a dispute from a CRA.

If a consumer disputes inaccurate information that led to a credit denial, and the furnisher fails to properly investigate and correct the information in accordance with this section, there might be a basis for a claim. However, if the denial occurred before the dispute was raised, proving causation and damages might be more complex.

Considerations

• Causation: Establishing a clear causal link between the credit denial and a violation of these specific provisions could be the key challenge. The denial occurred before the dispute process, so linking it directly to the actions (or failures) of the CRAs or furnishers during the investigation might be complex.
• Other Provisions: Other sections of the FCRA or related state laws might provide a more appropriate basis for a claim, depending on the specific facts of the situation.

Given the scenario you’ve described, where a credit denial occurred before the completion of the dispute investigation by the credit reporting agencies (CRAs) and the furnisher, you might consider pursuing claims under the following sections of the FCRA:

Section 1681e(b) – Reasonable Procedures

This section requires CRAs to follow reasonable procedures to ensure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates.

Potential Damages:

• Actual Damages: You could seek actual damages if you can demonstrate that the CRA’s failure to follow reasonable procedures led to the credit denial.
• Punitive Damages: In the case of willful noncompliance, you may also pursue punitive damages.

Section 1681s-2(a) – Responsibilities of Furnishers

This section imposes duties on furnishers to provide accurate information.

Potential Damages:

• Actual Damages: If you can demonstrate that the furnisher knowingly provided inaccurate information that led to the credit denial, actual damages may be recoverable.

Section 1681n and 1681o – Willful and Negligent Noncompliance

These sections provide for the recovery of damages for willful or negligent noncompliance with any requirement imposed under the FCRA.

Potential Damages:

• Actual Damages: Includes any out-of-pocket losses, emotional distress, or other harm directly resulting from the violation.
• Statutory Damages: For willful violations, you could seek statutory damages.
• Punitive Damages: May be available in the case of a willful violation.
• Attorney’s Fees: If successful, you may be able to recover attorney’s fees and costs under these provisions.

Conclusion

Your strategy might involve focusing on the conduct of both the CRAs and the furnisher leading up to the credit denial, rather than their actions during the dispute investigation. Proving a direct causal link between the violations and the credit denial will be essential, and you’ll likely need to gather evidence to demonstrate that the reporting was inaccurate and that the inaccuracies were a direct cause of the credit denial.

While it might be possible to bring a claim under these sections of the FCRA, the specific circumstances you described (credit denial occurring before the completion of the dispute investigation) may make it challenging. The case would likely require a detailed analysis of the facts, the timing, and the conduct of both the CRAs and the furnishers. Consulting relevant case law and perhaps seeking expert opinions or engaging in discovery to uncover more details about the parties’ conduct might be necessary steps in building a viable claim.

FREE Case Evaluation
WE ACCEPT CLIENTS NATIONWIDE
(888) 498-9533

How a Debt Lawsuit Defense Attorney Can Help You Against LVNV Funding LLC Lawsuit in Texas

LVNV Funding is a debt buying company that purchases old, charged-off debts from credit card companies, banks, and other creditors. Once LVNV Funding acquires these debts, they will attempt to collect the debt from the consumer or take legal action by filing a debt collection lawsuit.

If you are facing a debt collection lawsuit from LVNV Funding, it is essential to seek the assistance of an experienced debt lawsuit defense attorney. Here are a few ways that a debt lawsuit defense attorney can help you:

1. Review the Lawsuit and Ensure Compliance with Federal and State Laws

Debt collection companies such as LVNV Funding must comply with federal and state laws, including the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), which prohibits certain debt collection practices such as harassment, using false or misleading statements, and contacting third parties about the debt. Additionally, LVNV Funding must comply with state-specific debt collection laws, including the statute of limitations for debt collection lawsuits.

A debt lawsuit defense attorney can review the lawsuit filed by LVNV Funding and ensure that the company is following all applicable federal and state laws. If there are any violations of the law, the attorney can use this information to build a defense strategy on your behalf.

2. Challenge the Validity of the Debt

Debt buyers such as LVNV Funding purchase old, charged-off debts that may have been previously paid or settled. Additionally, the original creditor may have already written off the debt, meaning that it is no longer legally collectible. A debt lawsuit defense attorney can review the details of the debt and challenge the validity of the debt if it is inaccurate, invalid, or unenforceable.

3. Negotiate a Settlement or Payment Plan

A debt lawsuit defense attorney can also negotiate a settlement or payment plan on your behalf. This can help you avoid a judgment against you, which can negatively impact your credit score and result in wage garnishment or bank account seizure.

4. Represent You in Court

If LVNV Funding continues with the lawsuit, a debt lawsuit defense attorney can represent you in court. The attorney can argue on your behalf, challenge the evidence presented by LVNV Funding, and defend you against the lawsuit. If necessary, the attorney can also file counterclaims against LVNV Funding.

5. Provide Legal Advice and Guidance

A debt lawsuit defense attorney can provide you with legal advice and guidance throughout the entire process. The attorney can explain your legal rights, answer any questions you may have, and provide guidance on the best course of action to take.

In conclusion, if you are facing a debt collection lawsuit from LVNV Funding, it is crucial to seek the assistance of an experienced debt lawsuit defense attorney. The attorney can help you review the lawsuit for compliance with federal and state laws, challenge the validity of the debt, negotiate a settlement or payment plan, represent you in court, and provide legal advice and guidance. By having an attorney on your side, you can protect your legal rights and increase your chances of achieving a positive outcome.

Call Us for a Free Consultation

The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) was enacted to ensure the accuracy, fairness, and privacy of consumer credit information. Under the FCRA, both consumer reporting agencies and furnishers of information have specific requirements to follow. In this article, we will explore the requirements of the FCRA for consumer reporting agencies and furnishers and the remedies available to consumers when errors are not corrected.

(888) 498-9533
SERVING CONSUMERS NATIONWIDE

FCRA Requirements for Consumer Reporting Agencies

Consumer reporting agencies, also known as credit bureaus, are responsible for collecting and maintaining consumer credit information. Under the FCRA, consumer reporting agencies have specific obligations to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information they report. These obligations include:

1. Duty to investigate disputes: When a consumer disputes the accuracy of information on their credit report, the consumer reporting agency must conduct a reasonable investigation. The investigation must include a review of all relevant information provided by the consumer, the furnisher of the information, and any other sources.
2. Timeframe for investigation: The consumer reporting agency must complete the investigation within 30 days of receiving the dispute from the consumer. In some cases, this timeframe may be extended to 45 days if the consumer provides additional information during the investigation.
3. Notice to the consumer: After completing the investigation, the consumer reporting agency must provide the consumer with written results of the investigation, including any changes made to the consumer’s credit report.
4. Duty to correct errors: If the investigation determines that information on the consumer’s credit report is inaccurate or incomplete, the consumer reporting agency must correct the information and notify any other consumer reporting agencies to which it provided the information.

Remedies for Consumers When Consumer Reporting Agencies Fail to Comply with FCRA Requirements

If a consumer reporting agency fails to comply with the FCRA requirements, the consumer may have legal remedies. These remedies may include:

1. Actual damages: The consumer may be entitled to recover actual damages caused by the consumer reporting agency’s failure to comply with the FCRA. Actual damages may include out-of-pocket expenses, such as the cost of hiring an attorney, and damages for emotional distress.
2. Statutory damages: In some cases, the consumer may be entitled to statutory damages. The FCRA allows for statutory damages of up to $1,000 per violation.
3. Attorneys’ fees and costs: If the consumer prevails in a lawsuit against the consumer reporting agency, the consumer may be entitled to recover their attorneys’ fees and costs.

FCRA Requirements for Furnishers

Furnishers of information are entities that provide information about consumers to consumer reporting agencies. Under the FCRA, furnishers have specific obligations to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information they report. These obligations include:

1. Duty to investigate disputes: When a consumer disputes the accuracy of information reported to a consumer reporting agency, the furnisher must conduct a reasonable investigation.
2. Timeframe for investigation: The furnisher must investigate the dispute within 30 days of receiving notice from the consumer reporting agency.
3. Notice to the consumer: After completing the investigation, the furnisher must provide the consumer reporting agency with any corrections to the information and must notify the consumer of any changes made to their credit report.

Remedies for Consumers When Furnishers Fail to Comply with FCRA Requirements

If a furnisher fails to comply with the FCRA requirements, the consumer may have legal remedies. These remedies may include:

1. Actual damages: The consumer may be entitled to recover actual damages caused by the furnisher’s failure to comply with the FCRA. Actual damages may include out-of-pocket expenses, such as the cost of hiring an attorney, and damages for emotional distress.
2. Statutory damages: In some cases, the consumer may be entitled to statutory damages. The FCRA allows for statutory damages of up to $1,000 per violation.
3. Injunctive relief: The consumer may be entitled to injunctive relief, which is a court order requiring the furnisher to comply with the FCRA requirements in the future.
4. Attorneys’ fees and costs: If the consumer prevails in a lawsuit against the furnisher, the consumer may be entitled to recover their attorneys’ fees and costs.

It is important to note that consumers have the burden of proving that a furnisher violated the FCRA. This means that consumers must provide evidence that the furnisher failed to conduct a reasonable investigation or that the information provided to the consumer reporting agency was inaccurate or incomplete. Consumers may need the assistance of an FCRA attorney to gather the necessary evidence and build a strong case.

In conclusion, the FCRA provides important protections for consumers regarding the accuracy, fairness, and privacy of their credit information. Consumer reporting agencies and furnishers have specific obligations to ensure that consumer credit reports are accurate and complete. When errors are not corrected, consumers have legal remedies available to them, including the recovery of actual and statutory damages, injunctive relief, and attorneys’ fees and costs. An experienced FCRA attorney can help consumers navigate the legal process and protect their rights under the FCRA.

CALL FOR A FREE CASE EVALUATION

(888) 498-9533
SERVING CONSUMERS NATIONWIDE

Our Reviews

If you owe a debt in Texas, you may be wondering how long the creditor has to sue you for the debt. The answer depends on several factors, including the type of debt and the statute of limitations.

What is the Statute of Limitations for Debt Collection in Texas?

The statute of limitations for debt collection in Texas varies depending on the type of debt. In general, the statute of limitations ranges from two to six years. After the statute of limitations has expired, the creditor is no longer able to sue you for the debt.

Here is a breakdown of the statute of limitations for some common types of debts in Texas:

• Credit card debt: four years
• Written contracts: four years
• Oral contracts: four years
• Promissory notes: four years
• Open accounts (e.g., utility bills): four years
• Judgments: 10 years

It is important to note that the statute of limitations begins from the date of the last payment or activity on the account. So, if you made a payment on a debt that was already past the statute of limitations, the clock may reset, and the creditor may have additional time to sue you.

What Happens If a Creditor Sues You After the Statute of Limitations Has Expired?

If a creditor sues you for a debt after the statute of limitations has expired, you may have a defense against the lawsuit. You can raise the statute of limitations as a defense, and the court may dismiss the case.

However, it is important to respond to the lawsuit and raise the defense. If you do not respond, the court may enter a default judgment against you, and the creditor may be able to garnish your wages, freeze your bank accounts, or take other collection actions.

How Can a Debt Defense Attorney Help You?

If you are being sued for a debt in Texas, it is important to seek the advice of a debt defense attorney. An attorney can help you understand your legal rights and options and represent you in court.

A debt defense attorney can also help you negotiate with the creditor to settle the debt or set up a payment plan. If the creditor has violated your rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act or other consumer protection laws, an attorney can help you file a lawsuit against the creditor.

In addition, an attorney can help you understand the statute of limitations and whether it applies to your case. If the statute of limitations has expired, an attorney can raise it as a defense and potentially get the case dismissed.

Conclusion

The statute of limitations for debt collection in Texas varies depending on the type of debt. Once the statute of limitations has expired, the creditor is no longer able to sue you for the debt. However, it is important to respond to any lawsuits filed against you and raise the statute of limitations as a defense. If you need help with a debt collection lawsuit, consider speaking with a debt defense attorney who can advise you on your legal rights and options.

How Much Does it Cost to Hire a Debt Lawsuit Defense Attorney?

We charge a flat fee for your lawsuit defense based on the amount of the lawsuit. You can either pay upfront in full or finance it with a payment plan as shown below.

Flexible Payment Plans Available

Call for a Free Consultation at
(214) 945-0000

Your credit report is an important document that reflects your financial history and current credit standing. Credit reporting agencies, such as Equifax, TransUnion, and Experian, collect and maintain this information, which is used by lenders, employers, and other entities to make important decisions about your creditworthiness.

However, errors can occur on your credit report, and these errors can have a negative impact on your credit score and ability to obtain credit. Fortunately, there are several methods you can use to dispute credit report errors with the credit reporting agencies.

Method 1: Dispute by Mail

One of the most common methods of disputing credit report errors is by mail. To dispute an error on your credit report by mail, you will need to obtain a copy of your credit report from one or more of the credit reporting agencies.

Once you have reviewed your credit report and identified the errors, you will need to write a letter to the credit reporting agency that includes your name, address, and a detailed explanation of the error. Be sure to include any supporting documentation, such as copies of canceled checks, bank statements, or correspondence with the creditor.

You should also include a copy of your credit report with the errors highlighted or circled. Finally, send the letter and supporting documentation to the appropriate address for the credit reporting agency, which can be found on their website or on the credit report itself.

Equifax Information Services LLC
P.O. Box 740256
Atlanta, GA 30374-0256

https://www.equifax.com/personal/credit-report-services/credit-dispute/

TransUnion Consumer Solutions
P.O. Box 2000
Chester, PA 19016-2000

https://www.transunion.com/credit-disputes/dispute-your-credit

Experian
P.O. Box 4500
Allen, TX 75013

https://www.experian.com/disputes/main.html

Method 2: Dispute Online

Another method of disputing credit report errors is online. All three credit reporting agencies provide online dispute portals that allow you to dispute errors on your credit report electronically.

To dispute an error online, you will need to create an account on the credit reporting agency’s website and provide your personal information, including your name, address, and Social Security number. You will then need to identify the errors on your credit report and provide a detailed explanation of why the information is incorrect.

Equifax:

https://www.equifax.com/personal/credit-report-services/credit-dispute/

TransUnion:

https://www.transunion.com/credit-disputes/dispute-your-credit

Experian:

https://www.experian.com/disputes/main.html

Method 3: Dispute by Phone

You can also dispute credit report errors by phone. To dispute an error by phone, you will need to call the credit reporting agency’s dispute phone number, which can be found on their website or on your credit report.

You will be asked to provide your personal information, including your name, address, and Social Security number, as well as a detailed explanation of the error. You may also be asked to provide supporting documentation, such as bank statements or correspondence with the creditor.

Conclusion

Disputing credit report errors is an important step in maintaining your creditworthiness and financial well-being. By following these simple steps, you can correct errors on your credit report and protect your credit score. Whether you choose to dispute by mail, online, or by phone, it is important to be thorough and provide all necessary documentation to support your dispute.

Call For a Free Case Evaluation

Yes, debt collectors can sue you in Texas under certain conditions. As a consumer attorneys who practice debt collection lawsuit defense, we have extensive experience in this area and can defend you in these type of cases for flat legal fee.

Debt Collection Lawsuits in Texas

Debt collectors in Texas have the right to file a lawsuit against a debtor to collect money owed to them. The types of debts that can be the subject of a debt collection lawsuit in Texas include credit card debt, medical bills, personal loans, and other types of unsecured debt. Secured debt, such as a mortgage or auto loan, is generally not subject to debt collection lawsuits unless the creditor forecloses on the property or repossesses the vehicle and there is still an outstanding balance owed.

Statute of Limitations for Debt Collection Lawsuits in Texas

In Texas, debt collection lawsuits must be filed within a certain time period known as the statute of limitations. The statute of limitations varies depending on the type of debt and can range from two to six years. For example, the statute of limitations for credit card debt is four years from the date of the last payment or the date the debt was charged off, whichever is later. Once the statute of limitations has expired, the creditor is no longer legally able to sue the debtor for the debt.

Defenses to Debt Collection Lawsuits in Texas

If a debtor is sued by a creditor, there are several defenses that may be available to them. These defenses include:

1. Statute of limitations defense: If the statute of limitations has expired, the debtor can argue that the creditor is no longer legally entitled to collect the debt.
2. Lack of standing defense: If the creditor is unable to prove that they own the debt, the debtor can argue that the creditor does not have standing to sue.
3. Identity theft defense: If the debt is a result of identity theft, the debtor can argue that they are not responsible for the debt.
4. Fraudulent or deceptive practices defense: If the creditor engaged in fraudulent or deceptive practices in attempting to collect the debt, the debtor can argue that the debt is not valid.
5. Lack of documentation defense: If the creditor is unable to provide sufficient documentation to prove the debt, the debtor can argue that the debt is not valid.

How a Debt Defense Attorney Can Help

If you are facing a debt collection lawsuit in Texas, it is important to seek the advice of an experienced consumer attorney who practices debt collection lawsuit defense. A debt defense attorney can help you understand your legal rights and options, and work with you to develop a strategy to protect your interests and defend against the lawsuit. Some of the ways a debt defense attorney can help include:

1. Evaluating the debt: An attorney can help you evaluate the debt and determine if it is valid and if there are any defenses available.
2. Negotiating a settlement: An attorney can negotiate with the creditor to reach a settlement that is favorable to you and that you can afford.
3. Representing you in court: If the case goes to court, an attorney can represent you and defend against the lawsuit.
4. Protecting your rights: An attorney can help you understand your legal rights and work to ensure that the creditor does not violate those rights in attempting to collect the debt.
5. Filing counterclaims: If the creditor has violated your rights under the FDCPA or other consumer protection laws, an attorney can file counterclaims on your behalf seeking damages and attorney’s fees.

Conclusion

In conclusion, debt collectors in Texas have the right to sue debtors to collect money owed to them, but debtors have legal protections and defenses available to them. If you are facing a debt collection lawsuit, it is important to seek the advice of an experienced debt defense attorney who can help

How Much Does it Cost to Hire a Debt Lawsuit Defense Attorney?

We charge a flat fee for your lawsuit defense based on the amount of the lawsuit. You can either pay upfront in full or finance it with a payment plan as shown below.

Flexible Payment Plans Available

Call Us for a Free Consultation

If you’re being harassed by debt collectors, you may feel helpless and overwhelmed. Fortunately, there is a powerful tool that you can use to stop debt collectors in their tracks: the 11-word phrase.

Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), you have the right to demand that debt collectors stop contacting you. You can exercise this right by simply saying or writing the following 11-word phrase:

“Stop contacting me at work. I refuse to PAY this debt.”

That’s it. It’s that simple. Once you say or write these words, debt collectors are required by law to stop contacting you, except in certain limited circumstances. For example, they can contact you to inform you that they are ceasing collection efforts or that they are taking legal action against you.

It’s important to note that you must use these exact words in order to trigger the protections of the FDCPA. Saying something similar or using different language may not be effective in stopping debt collectors from contacting you.

Once you’ve used the 11-word phrase to stop debt collectors, they are required by law to cease all communication with you, except as permitted by the FDCPA. They cannot contact you at work, call you repeatedly, or use abusive language or threats to try to collect the debt.

If debt collectors continue to contact you after you’ve used the 11-word phrase, they are in violation of the FDCPA and you may have a legal case against them. You should keep records of all communication with debt collectors, including the dates and times of calls, the names of the people who called you, and any abusive or threatening language that they used.

If you’re being harassed by debt collectors, don’t suffer in silence. Use the 11-word phrase to stop them in their tracks and protect your rights under the FDCPA. If debt collectors continue to harass you, contact an attorney who can help you take legal action to stop the harassment and hold debt collectors accountable for their actions.

At Shawn Jaffer & Associates, our experienced attorneys can help you assert your rights under the FDCPA and protect you from abusive debt collection practices. Contact us today to schedule a consultation.

If you are facing a credit card debt lawsuit in Texas, it is important to be aware of the various defenses that you may be able to raise in response to the lawsuit. An experienced debt lawsuit defense attorney at Jaffer & Associates can help you navigate the legal system and ensure that your rights are protected. Here are some of the defenses that may be available to you under Texas law.

1. (1) Statute of Limitations: Texas has a statute of limitations for debt collection, which limits the amount of time that a creditor has to sue for a debt. If the statute of limitations has passed, you may be able to argue that the creditor is no longer able to collect on the debt and the lawsuit should be dismissed.
2. (2) Mistake in the calculation of the debt: There may be instances where the creditor has made a mistake in calculating the amount of the debt. If this is the case, you may be able to argue that the amount claimed in the lawsuit is incorrect.
3. (3) Lack of evidence: The creditor must prove that you owe the debt by presenting evidence in court. If they are unable to do so, the lawsuit may be dismissed.
4. (4) Payment or satisfaction of the debt: If you have already paid the debt or have reached a settlement with the creditor, you may be able to argue that the debt has been satisfied and the lawsuit should be dismissed.
5. (5) Illegality of the debt: There may be instances where the debt was incurred under illegal or unethical circumstances. If this is the case, you may be able to argue that the debt is not enforceable and the lawsuit should be dismissed.
6. (6) Improper service of the lawsuit: In order for a lawsuit to be valid, the defendant must be properly served with the lawsuit. If you have not been properly served, you may be able to argue that the lawsuit is not valid.
7. (7) Fair debt collection practices: Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), debt collectors are prohibited from using certain practices in their efforts to collect a debt. If a debt collector has violated the FDCPA, you may be able to raise this as a defense in the lawsuit.

These are just a few of the defenses that may be available to you in a credit card debt lawsuit in Texas. It is important to seek the help of an experienced debt lawsuit defense attorney at Jaffer & Associates to ensure that your rights are protected and to increase your chances of a successful outcome.

For a Free Consultation please call (469) 589-5600

Proving a bona fide error defense in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) litigation can be a challenging task, as it requires the debt collector to show that it had implemented reasonable procedures to avoid any errors, and that the error that occurred was not the result of the debt collector’s violation of the FDCPA.

In order to prove a bona fide error defense, the debt collector must be able to demonstrate that:

• It had in place reasonable procedures to avoid the errors;
• The error was not the result of a violation of the FDCPA, but rather, occurred despite the procedures in place;
• The error occurred as a result of an unintentional act or an unintentional system malfunction;
• The error was not the result of a pattern or practice of noncompliance;
• The error was corrected as soon as it was discovered.

It is also important to note that the FDCPA also allows for an affirmative defense to a claim under the Act if the violation was not intentional and resulted from a bona fide error despite the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid any such error.

The debt collector should be able to provide evidence of the reasonable procedures that were in place, the specific error that occurred, and the steps that were taken to correct it. It’s also important to note that the burden of proof is on the debt collector to demonstrate that the error was bona fide and that the FDCPA was not violated.

It’s always recommended to consult with an attorney who is knowledgeable in the FDCPA and the case law interpreting it to understand the specific details of a case.